Bernard Kasavuli Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 2 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 2017 to 2018; busiest year 2017 (2 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Election Petition: Petitioner's application for audit, scrutiny, recount, and r (1); Petitioner's petition dismissed (1)
- Criminal Appeal: Affirmed (1)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Elections Act, 2011 (1)
- Elections (Parliamentary and County Elections Petition) Rules, 2017 (1)
Writing characteristics
- Too few decisions to characterize writing structure
Remedy patterns
- Audit, scrutiny, recount, and re-tallying of election materials in eight specific polling stations (1)
- Grant of read-only access to SD Cards for the petitioner to verify voter turnout (1)
Sample decisions
John Osumba Olum v Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission & 2 others [2017] KEMC 80 (KLR)
Magistrate's Courts · [2017] KEMC 80 (KLR)
John Osumba Olum v Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission & 2 others [2018] KEMC 61 (KLR)
Magistrate's Courts · [2018] KEMC 61 (KLR)