Daniel Njiru Tiras v Republic [2015] KECA 1003 (KLR)
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- 1003
- Citation
- [2015] KECA 1003 (KLR)
- Decided
- 21 January 2015
The appeal is dismissed as the appellant was found in possession of the stolen mobile phone a few days after the robbery, leading to the conclusion that he was involved in the robbery.
Facts
The appellant and co-accused were charged with robbery with violence and handling stolen property. The prosecution alleged that the appellant and his co-accused robbed Ann Leah Muthoni and Justus Njagi, and handled stolen property. The appellant denied the charges.
Issues
- Whether the appellant was involved in the robbery with violence
- Whether the appellant was in possession of the stolen mobile phone within a reasonable time after the robbery
Reasoning
The prosecution proved that the stolen mobile phone was found in the appellant's possession a few days after the robbery. The appellant did not provide a reasonable explanation for his possession of the phone, leading to the conclusion that he was involved in the robbery.
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Authorities cited
Cases cited (3)
- Francis Kariuki Thuku & 2 others -vs- Republic [2010] eKLR
- Hassan -vs- Republic [2005] 2 KLR 11
- George Otieno Dida & Another -vs-Republic [2011] eKLR
Loading judgment…