SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Jonathan Bwire Ojiambo v Rosemary Auma Abangi & another [2015] KECA 222 (KLR)

[2015] KECA 222 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
222
Citation
[2015] KECA 222 (KLR)
Decided
17 November 2015
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypecivilPostureAppeal from a High Court judgmentCoramD. K. Maraga, D. K. Musinga, S. Gatebu Kairu, FCIArb
Holding

The appeal is allowed, and the High Court's judgment is set aside. The appellant is declared the registered proprietor of the suit properties, and the respondents are ordered to vacate the same.

Facts

The appellant, Jonathan Bwire Ojiambo, claimed to be the registered owner of land parcels Nos. Bunyala/Bulemia 3603 and 3604, which were disputed by the 1st and 2nd respondents. The 1st respondent claimed ownership of parcel No. 363, which was part of the disputed land.

Issues

  1. Whether the Budalangi Land Disputes Tribunal had jurisdiction to award the disputed land to the 1st respondent.
  2. Whether the High Court's judgment dismissing the appellant's case was res judicata.

Reasoning

The court found that the tribunal's award was valid in law and that the appellant was the registered owner of the suit properties. The respondents' claim was not res judicata as there was another suit in the same court.

Outcome

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • The appellant is declared the registered proprietor of the suit properties.
  • The respondents are ordered to vacate the suit properties.
  • Each party bears its own costs of the High Court suit and the costs of the appeal.

Remedies

  • Declaration of ownership
  • Permanent injunction
  • Order to vacate the suit properties

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Land Disputes Act No. 18 of 1990
  • Registered Land Act (now repealed)
Cases cited (1)
  • Registered Land Act (now repealed)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case