SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kenya Tea Growers Association & another v Kenya Plantation & Agricultural Workers Union [2015] KECA 454 (KLR)

[2015] KECA 454 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
454
Citation
[2015] KECA 454 (KLR)
Decided
31 July 2015
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypecivilPostureappeal from a ruling and orders of the Industrial CourtCoramE. M. GITHINJI, J. MOHAMMED, J. OTIENO-ODEK
Holding

The appeal has partial merit, and the suo moto interlocutory orders made by the trial court no longer exist and have lapsed into the ruling delivered by the trial court on 22nd March 2011. Each party shall bear its own costs.

Facts

The Kenya Tea Growers Association and Unilever Tea Kenya Limited filed a constitutional petition against the Kenya Plantation & Agricultural Workers Union. The respondent union threatened a strike due to the increased use of tea plucking machines, leading to an injunction request by the appellants.

Issues

  1. whether the Industrial Court had jurisdiction to hear the case while three constitutional petitions were pending
  2. the validity of the suo moto interlocutory orders made by the trial court

Reasoning

The Court found that the Industrial Court had jurisdiction to hear the case despite the pending constitutional petitions, and the orders made by the trial court are valid.

Outcome

partial success

Orders

  • the suo moto interlocutory orders made by the trial court no longer exist and have lapsed into the ruling delivered by the trial court on 22nd March 2011
  • each party shall bear its own costs

Authorities cited

Cases cited (1)
  • Kenya National Examination Council -v- R ex parte Geoffrey Githenji Njoroge & 9 Others, Civil Appeal No. 266 of 1996
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case