SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Trinity Prime Investment Ltd v Lion of Kenya Insurance Company Ltd (Civil Appeal 147 of 2005) [2015] KECA 793 (KLR)

[2015] KECA 793 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
793
Citation
[2015] KECA 793 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from the Judgment and Decree of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Ringera, J.)CoramJUDGE OF APPEAL, MWERA, MBALUTO, RINGERA, THEN RINGERA
Holding

The court found that the payment made by the respondent was not in full and final settlement of the claim under the policy, and that the discharge voucher was conditional on further payment.

Facts

The appellant company filed a claim for a balance due on a domestic package insurance policy, while the respondent insurance company paid out Sh.6,023,529/= on 21st March, 1997. The appellant claimed a balance of Sh.6,776,471/=. The appellant and the respondent had other insurance policies covering the same property.

Issues

  1. whether the signed discharge voucher and the payment made of Sh.6,023,529/= constituted a compromise and surrender of the appellant’s right herein
  2. the need to consider the question of the rateable clause policies issued by the respondent and Madison

Reasoning

The court held that the discharge voucher was not clear and unambiguous, and that the payment was conditional on further payment. The court also ordered the respondent to pay the balance of Sh.6,776,471/=. The court also ordered costs to be paid on account of the rent loss claim.

Outcome

Affirmed

Orders

  • The respondent to pay the balance of Sh.6,776,471/= to the appellant
  • Costs to be paid on account of the rent loss claim

Authorities cited

Cases cited (1)
  • Bank of Credit and Commerce International S.A vs Ali & Others [2001] 1 AC 259
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case