SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Lucy Njeri Njoroge v Kaiyahe Njoroge [2015] KECA 960 (KLR)

[2015] KECA 960 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
960
Citation
[2015] KECA 960 (KLR)
Decided
30 January 2015
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from a High Court judgmentCoramR. Nambuye, D. Musinga, A. K. Murgor
Holding

The appeal is allowed, the ruling of the Business Premises Tribunal is declared null and void, and the High Court judgment is set aside. The appellant is ordered to pay the balance of the purchase price for specific performance of the sale agreement.

Facts

The respondent and appellant, brother and sister, agreed to sell a half share of the suit property for Kshs. 350,000. The appellant paid Kshs. 210,000, and agreed to pay the balance in two installments. The respondent filed a reference to the Business Premises Rent Tribunal to terminate the tenancy and convert the deposit to rent arrears. The appellant claimed ownership and sought specific performance.

Issues

  1. Whether the respondent's termination of the tenancy was valid
  2. Whether the appellant was entitled to specific performance of the sale agreement

Reasoning

The court found the respondent's termination of the tenancy was based on nonexistent tenancy and thus incapable of enforcement. The court ordered specific performance of the sale agreement.

Outcome

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Ruling of the Business Premises Tribunal declared null and void
  • High Court judgment set aside
  • Order for specific performance of the sale agreement

Remedies

  • Payment of the balance of the purchase price
  • Order of specific performance

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Landlord and Tenant (Shops, Hotels, and Catering Establishments) Act
Cases cited (1)
  • National Dock Labour Board (supra)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case