SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Richard Kioko Kiundi v Kenya Pipeline Company [2019] KECA 618 (KLR)

[2019] KECA 618 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
618
Citation
[2019] KECA 618 (KLR)
Decided
21 June 2019
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAppealPostureApplication for extension of time to lodge and serve the memorandum of Appeal and the Record of Appeal out of timeCoramW. OUKO
Holding

The court grants the application and orders that the appeal be filed within fourteen (14) days from the date of this decision.

Facts

The applicant filed a notice of appeal on 22 January 2018, but the proceedings and judgment were not complete. The applicant applied for copies of the proceedings and judgment, which were supplied on 27 February 2018. The applicant then applied for an extension of time to lodge and serve the appeal due to a delay.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time to lodge and serve the appeal
  2. Whether the applicant's delay in applying for an extension of time was reasonable

Reasoning

The court exercised its discretion to grant the extension of time, considering the length of the delay, the reason for the delay, and the conduct of the parties. The court found that the applicant's delay was not prejudicial and that the appeal had chances of success.

Outcome

The application is granted.

Orders

  • The appeal be filed within fourteen (14) days from the date of this decision

Authorities cited

Cases cited (3)
  • Leo Sila Mutiso v. Rose Wangari Mwangi, CA No. Nai. 255 of 1997
  • Imperial Bank Limited (In Receivership) & another V. Alnashir Popat & 18 others [2018] eKLR
  • Athuman Nusura Juma V. Afwa Mohamed Ramadhan, CA No 227 of 2015
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case