SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kenya Ports Authority Pension Scheme & 8 others v Kinyua Muyaa & Co. Advocates (Civil Appeal 69 of 2020) [2022] KECA 578 (KLR) (6 May 2022) (Judgment)

[2022] KECA 578 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
578
Citation
[2022] KECA 578 (KLR)
Decided
6 May 2022
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from the Employment and Labour Relations Court ruling and order dismissing the application to set aside an advocate-client bill of costs and entering judgment in favor of the AdvocatesCoramGatembu Kairu, JW Lessit, P Nyamweya
Holding

The appeal is allowed, and the learned Judge of the ELRC's ruling and order are set aside. The Advocates' advocate-client bill of costs is not to be taxed, and the judgment entered in their favor is set aside.

Facts

The Kenya Ports Authority Pension Scheme and 8 others (the Client) challenged a ruling by the Employment and Labour Relations Court (Rika, J.) dismissing their application to set aside an advocate-client bill of costs presented by Kinyua Muyaa & Co. Advocates. The Advocates subsequently filed an application to strike out the appeal, which was subsumed in the appeal.

Issues

  1. Whether the Employment and Labour Relations Court erred in failing to consider and analyze the applicable principles in the taxation of the Advocates' advocate-client bill of costs
  2. Whether the learned Judge of the ELRC erred in failing to correct the errors committed by the taxing officer in the taxation of instruction fees, getting-up fees, and award of interest and VAT

Reasoning

The Court found that the learned Judge of the ELRC erred in failing to consider and analyze the applicable principles in the taxation of the Advocates' advocate-client bill of costs, and in failing to correct the errors committed by the taxing officer in the taxation of instruction fees, getting-up fees, and award of interest and VAT.

Outcome

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • The learned Judge of the ELRC's ruling and order are set aside
  • The Advocates' advocate-client bill of costs is not to be taxed
  • The judgment entered in their favor is set aside

Remedies

  • The Advocates' advocate-client bill of costs is not to be taxed
  • The judgment entered in their favor is set aside

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Value Added Tax Act, 2013
  • Employment and Labour Relations Act
Cases cited (1)
  • Pyramid Motors Limited vs Langata Gardens Limited
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.4 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case