SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kandie v Lekakeny (Civil Application E016 of 2022) [2022] KECA 994 (KLR) (23 September 2022) (Ruling)

[2022] KECA 994 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
994
Citation
[2022] KECA 994 (KLR)
Decided
23 September 2022
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil ApplicationPostureAppeal from a judgment of the Mombasa Environment and Land CourtCoramS. GATEMBU KAIRU, P. NYAMWEYA, J. LESIIT
Holding

The court grants the status quo order to preserve the suit land pending the appeal and directs the Deputy Registrar to fix both appeals for hearing together.

Facts

The applicant and respondent entered into a sale agreement for the suit land, but the respondent filed a suit claiming the applicant did not complete the payment. The applicant appealed the judgment, and the respondent opposed the appeal.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant's appeal is arguable
  2. Whether the orders sought by the applicant will render the appeal nugatory

Reasoning

The court finds the appeal arguable and grants the status quo order to preserve the suit land. The court directs the Deputy Registrar to fix both appeals for hearing together due to the pending nature of the appeals.

Outcome

The court grants the status quo order and directs the Deputy Registrar to fix both appeals for hearing together.

Orders

  • Status quo order to preserve the suit land pending the appeal

Remedies

  • Preservation of the suit land pending the appeal

Authorities cited

Cases cited (3)
  • Regnoil Kenya Ltd V Winfred Njeri Karanja [2019] eKLR
  • Ruben & others V Nderitu & another [1989] eKLR
  • Joseph Gitahi Gachau & Another v. Pioneer Holdings (A) Ltd. & 2 others, Civil Application No. 124 of 2008
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case