SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kariuki & 3 others (Suing on their behalf and as Officials of the Bethel Church of God) v Moilo & 2 others (Suing on their own behalf and in their Capacity as National Officials of Bethel Church) (Civil Application 202 of 2016) [2023] KECA 64 (KLR) (3 February 2023) (Ruling)

[2023] KECA 64 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
64
Citation
[2023] KECA 64 (KLR)
Decided
3 February 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil ApplicationPostureAppeal from a High Court rulingCoramH. A. OMONDI, DR. K. I. LAIBUTA, M. GACHOKA – CI Arb, FCIARB
Holding

The appeal is arguable and the applicants' prayer for stay of execution is dismissed with costs.

Facts

Two factions of the Bethel Church had a dispute over ownership of land and properties. The High Court declared the applicants' registration of Bethel Church of God invalid and ordered them to surrender titles and documents. The applicants appealed, seeking a stay of execution of the orders.

Issues

  1. Whether the High Court issued final orders at an interlocutory stage without special circumstances
  2. Whether the appeal would be rendered nugatory

Reasoning

The court found the appeal arguable and considered the factors that render an appeal nugatory. The court concluded that the applicants' hardship is not greater than the respondents' and that damages would reasonably compensate the aggrieved party.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion Application dated 30th August 2016 is dismissed with costs to the respondents.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (3)
  • Stanley Kangethe Kinyanjui vs. Tony Ketter & 5 Others [2013] eKLR
  • Reliance Bank Limited vs. Norlake Investment Limited [2002]1 EA 227
  • African Safari Club Limited vs. Safe Rentals Limited, Nai. Civ. App 53 of 2010
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case