SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Nabaro Kariankei & another v Jane Wambui Kamoye & 3 others [2021] KEELC 1126 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 1126 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
1126
Citation
[2021] KEELC 1126 (KLR)
Decided
10 November 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand DisputePostureAppeal from a previous order granting a temporary injunctionCoramMBOGO C.G
Holding

The court finds the application an abuse of court process and directs an order of status quo pending the hearing and determination of the substantive suit.

Facts

The 1st petitioner is the administrator of the estate of Musana Kariankei. The 1st respondent is Jane Wambui Kamoye, the 3rd respondent is the District Land Registrar Narok, and the 4th respondent is the Chairman of Ogiglai Group Ranch. The dispute involves a parcel of land known as Title No. CIS Mara/Ololulunga/12222.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicants are entitled to a temporary injunction
  2. Whether the application is an abuse of court process

Reasoning

The court agrees with the respondent that the issues raised in the application are similar to those in a previous application, which is pending determination before the same court. The court directs an order of status quo as at the time of filing this suit.

Outcome

The application is dismissed and the substantive suit is ordered to proceed.

Orders

  • Order of status quo as at the time of filing this suit pending the hearing and determination of the substantive suit

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Article 40 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010
  • Law of Succession Act, Cap 160, Laws of Kenya
  • Land Registration Act No. 3 of 2012, Laws of Kenya
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case