SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kenneth Kang’ethe Chege v Alexander Kisilu & 2 others [2021] KEELC 2613 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 2613 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
2613
Citation
[2021] KEELC 2613 (KLR)
Decided
6 May 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand DisputePosturePlaintiff's claim for injunctions, declaration, and damages against the defendants for trespass and unauthorized construction on the plaintiff's land.CoramE.O.OBAGA
Holding

The court finds that the plaintiff has proved his case on a balance of probabilities and allows the plaintiff's claim in terms of prayers (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), in addition to general damages for trespass assessed at Kshs.500,000/=.

Facts

The plaintiff purchased Plot No.275 from John Mwaura, a member of Embakasi/Njiru United Self Help Group. The plaintiff claims that the 1st Defendant, Alexander Kisilu, has trespassed on Plot No.275, which belongs to the plaintiff. The 1st Defendant constructed on Plot No.275 instead of Plot No.276, which is his own property.

Issues

  1. Ownership of Plot No.275
  2. Trespass by the 1st Defendant

Reasoning

The court accepted the plaintiff's evidence and the documents produced, finding that the 1st Defendant constructed on the wrong plot, which belongs to the plaintiff. The court declined the plaintiff's claim for compensation for developments on Plot No.274 as the plaintiff did not provide evidence.

Outcome

The plaintiff is awarded a permanent injunction, a declaration of ownership, and general damages for trespass. The plaintiff is ordered to remove structures built by the 1st Defendant from Plot No.275, and the 1st Defendant is ordered to pay costs of the suit.

Orders

  • A permanent injunction restraining the 1st Defendant from trespassing on, developing, or otherwise dealing with Plot No.275
  • A declaration that Plot No.275 belongs to the plaintiff
  • A permanent injunction restraining the 1st Defendant from vacating Plot No.275 and removing all structures built thereon at his cost
  • The 1st Defendant is ordered to pay costs of the suit

Remedies

  • General damages for trespass assessed at Kshs.500,000/=
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case