SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Sijenyi v M.P Shah Hospital (Cause 976 of 2017) [2023] KEELRC 2019 (KLR) (31 July 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KEELRC 2019 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
2019
Citation
[2023] KEELRC 2019 (KLR)
Decided
31 July 2023
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment DisputePostureAppeal from an original trialCoramSTELLA RUTTO
The Court found that the Respondent had justifiable cause to terminate the Claimant's employment and that the termination was in line with fair procedure. The Claimant is entitled to compensatory damages, interest, and costs.

Facts

The Claimant, Rebah Sijenyi, was employed by M.P Shah Hospital as a Marketing Manager on permanent and pensionable terms. She was terminated on November 15, 2016, without written reasons. She claims the termination was unlawful and seeks compensatory damages, damages for constitutional breach, notice pay, and leave pay.

Issues

  • Whether the Respondent has proved justifiable cause to terminate the Claimant's employment
  • Whether the Claimant's termination was in line with fair procedure
  • Whether the Claimant is entitled to the reliefs sought

Reasoning

The Court found that the reasons for termination were substantiated and that the termination was fair. The Claimant's allegations were vague and lacked particulars.

Outcome

The Claimant's claim was dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Compensatory damages in the sum of Kshs 1,601,160.00
  • Interest on the amount in (a) at court rates from the date of Judgment until payment in full
  • The Claimant shall also have the costs of the suit

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act, 2007
Cases cited (1)
  • Ol Pejeta Ranching Limited v David Wanjau Muhoro (2017) eKLR
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case