SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mutonyi v Phoenix Aviation Limited (Cause 549 of 2016) [2023] KEELRC 707 (KLR) (15 March 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KEELRC 707 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
707
Citation
[2023] KEELRC 707 (KLR)
Decided
15 March 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeEmployment DisputePostureClaimant v RespondentCoramJK GAKERI
Holding

The court finds that the termination was substantively justifiable due to the theft allegation, but the date of termination is unclear. The court also finds that the termination was procedurally fair.

Facts

Claimant Mutonyi was employed by Wine Masters Limited and later by Phoenix Aviation Limited. He was arrested and charged with theft in 2013, and his employment was terminated by word of mouth.

Issues

  1. Whether termination of employment was unfair
  2. Whether Claimant is entitled to the reliefs sought

Reasoning

The court concludes that the termination was substantively justifiable due to the theft allegation, but procedural fairness is upheld. The date of termination is unclear.

Outcome

Claimant's employment was terminated by word of mouth, and the court finds the termination procedurally fair.

Remedies

  • Salary for April 2013
  • 3 months' salary in lieu of notice
  • Overtime pay
  • Service pay for 10 years
  • Damages for unfair termination and hardship

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act
Cases cited (4)
  • Walter Ogal Anuro v Teachers Service Commission (2013) eKLR
  • Naima Khamis v Oxford University Press (E.A) Limited (2017) eKLR
  • Nicholus Kipkemoi Korir v Hatari Security Guards (2016) eKLR
  • Humphrey Munyithya Mutemi v Soluxe International Group of Hotels and Lodges Limited (2020) eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case