SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Parsimei & 2 others v Party & 5 others; And The Independent Electoral And Boundaries Commission (Interested Party) (Constitutional Reference 356 & 359 of 2012) [2012] KEHC 2603 (KLR) (Judicial Review) (22 August 2012) (Ruling)

[2012] KEHC 2603 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2603
Citation
[2012] KEHC 2603 (KLR)
Decided
22 August 2012
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureAppeal from a High Court decisionCoramD. S. MAJAN, Mr
Holding

The court held that the High Court cannot entertain applications seeking conservatory orders to stop the nomination of candidates in light of the provisions of Article 88(4)(e) and section 74 of the Elections Act, 2011.

Facts

Two petitions were consolidated before the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi, Constitutional and Human Rights, alleging rigging in political party nominations for the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) for the Kangema and Kajiado North By-election.

Issues

  1. Whether the High Court can entertain applications seeking conservatory orders to stop the nomination of candidates in light of the provisions of Article 88(4)(e) and section 74 of the Elections Act, 2011.
  2. Whether the High Court should intervene to stop the electoral process so that a party who claims that his or her rights have been infringed can agitate his rights before the court.

Reasoning

The Constitution must be read as a whole, and the Bill of Rights protects the political rights of the petitioners. However, the court determined that the High Court should not intervene to stop the electoral process.

Outcome

The High Court's application for conservatory orders was dismissed.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Elections Act, 2011
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case