SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v Attorney General [sued for and on behalf of the Ministry of Lands] & 2 others Ex-parte South and Central [Thika] Investments Limited [2014] KEHC 7730 (KLR)

[2014] KEHC 7730 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
7730
Citation
[2014] KEHC 7730 (KLR)
Decided
25 March 2014
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureApplication for Mandamus and ProhibitionCoramThe Honorable Judge
Holding

The court denied the application for mandamus and prohibition.

Facts

The applicant, South and Central [Thika] Investments Limited, sought to register a land transfer and obtain a title for Land Reference Number 8747 located in Thika Municipality. The applicant alleged that the land was being sold by the National Bank of Kenya and that they had paid the deposit.

Issues

  1. Whether the court should issue an order of mandamus compelling the respondents to register the transfer and issue a title in favor of the applicant.
  2. Whether the court should issue an order of prohibition prohibiting the respondents from receiving, registering, and/or accepting any challenges or contests to the applicant's title.

Reasoning

The court considered the parameters of judicial review and the principles set out in previous cases. The court found that mandamus cannot compel the performance of a duty that has already been performed, and that prohibition cannot quash a decision that has already been made.

Outcome

The application was dismissed.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Land Registration Act 2012
  • Articles 10, 73 and 159 of the Constitution
Cases cited (3)
  • Republic vs. Kenya National Examinations Council ex parte Gathenji & Others Civil Appeal No. 266 of 1996
  • Municipal Council of Mombasa vs. Republic & Umoja Consultants Ltd Civil Appeal No. 185 of 2001
  • Republic vs. Kenya Revenue Authority Ex parte Yaya Towers Limited [2008] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case